Statistics about Acupuncture growth and success
 

There is increasing proof that acupuncture is an efficient therapy for several chronic pain conditions and comparatively safe. The advantages of pain relief and the experience of relaxation method following acupuncture seem to outweigh the imagined risks of adverse responses to treatments for most of the patients. Wellness clinic recommends acupuncture as an impactful therapy for the quick

management of low back pain, and there is some proof that general practitioners promote acupuncture being more effective in primary care. The funding for acupuncture clinics in usual practice has been tough, and provisions of acupuncture in primary care are uneven, which has led to several patients turning to independent practitioners for treatment.

Including everything, we have not enough knowledge about the experts who provide acupuncture treatment, what problems patients most generally consult for, the attributes of the treatment given and how the problems treated have modified over time. The consumption of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the American Adult population enhanced substantially throughout the 1990s and has continued at a relatively stable rate (36-38%) over the last decade. Notably, the use of practitioner-based CAM modalities like chiropractic care; massage and acupuncture have enhanced importantly in the USA from 2002-2007. Acupuncture has fetched public attention as well as researchers’ interest since it was launched to the USA in 1970s.

The National Health Interview Survey exposed that 1.1% of the American adults had utilized acupuncture within the past 12 months. By 2007, this number has increased to three million, a 50% enhance in five years. There were 79.2 visits to acupuncturists per one thousand adults in 2007, a virtually triple increase from the 277.2 visits accounted in 1997. The acupuncture workforce has also been evolving. As of 2003, there were 20,750 licensed acupuncturists in the United States and based on the most recent available data; the quantity was estimated to be 28,000 licensed in 2009 and still keep enhancing. Nevertheless, when equated to other western countries, Americans are reported as having a lesser prevalence ofacupuncture usethan their counterparts in Norway, the UK, Australia, and Denmark. Reasons for Americans utilizing or not utilizing acupuncture are worthy of researching.
Old research reported that predisposing factors (e.g., education and ethnicity), modifying factors (e.g., area of the residence) and medical requirement and personal health practices are linked with women’s present use of acupuncture services. NHIS added new queries in 2007 specifically pertaining to the reasons of never used acupuncture or not used it in the past one year as well as patient’s acupuncture use aggregated with other treatments. We have received requests from many members of the media about acupuncture statistics, and we have observed some others who should experience acupuncture. So here we have organized what we have found and put it all here along with requisite references for skeptical scientists.

Open-minded to Acupuncture

According to a small National Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (NCCAOM) survey. A calculated 10% of Americans have experienced acupuncture, and of those who haven’t 2/3rd would believe it. If true, this would show about 30 million Americans have attempted acupuncture, which is superb, thinking it has been the only therapy in the U.S for 30 years and there are just 15,000 acupuncturists, many of whom have only been registered in the last decade.
Still, data from a 2004 U.S. Dpt of Health and Human Service report estimated responses from a big group of Americans (31,044) from the National Health Interview Survey in 2002 and discovered that only 4% had ever attempted acupuncture. However, the same data showcases that acupuncture is a bit more popular than homeopathy, four times more famous than naturopathy and ten times more beneficial than Ayurveda.

Accepted by Western Medicine

According to a 1998 research of the literature published in the Archives of Internal Medicine, Western medical doctors are most probable to mention patients for acupuncture (43%) than massage (21%) or chiropractic (40%). This conforms to the general perception by Western specialists that chiropractors have still to show the value of their therapy with studies, while many MD’s are mindful of some of the science that explains and supports acupuncture leastwise.
However, the 2004 USDH report depicts that five times as many people had ever experienced chiropractic than acupuncture and nearly eight times as many of them had experienced chiropractic in the last year. This is probably because Americans have been mindful of chiropractic longer and because chiropractors have been so effectively reaching out to potential patients directly. Similarly, the 2004 USDH report showcases that of the people who used a substitute medicine system (Ayurveda, acupuncture, naturopathy or homeopathy) more people attempted acupuncture than the other methods because of their schematic medical professional recommended it.

Studies on Acupuncture

Following the outdated National Institute of Heath’s Consensus Statement on Acupuncture is the World Health Organization’s 2002 review of randomized controlled acupuncture Tryouts. They sorted their results this way;
· 28 disorders for which acupuncture is doubtlessly effective
· 63 diseases for which acupuncture has been indicated effective but more proof is required
· Nine disease Western medicine can’t treat well (evidence is rickety, but acupuncture is worth trying) and
· Seven ailments in which acupuncture could be attempted if the practitioner has enough medical equipment and knowledge

This is only one type of research which responds to the query “does acupuncture certainly help people with such and such disorders? Answering such queries is difficult by the truth that there is more than one style of acupuncture and so even if one technique doesn’t fit if the others haven’t been attempted, we can’t close it that all acupuncture won’t help the stipulation in question.

Moreover, there are different types of research that look more distinct at what different acupuncture points impact parts of the body. For instance, PET-scans and MRI’s have depicted particular areas of the brain stimulated by specific points. Since many people with the same disorders have different problems, breaking the research down into these components may give more valuable data for clinical acupuncture than just finding out one or another compounding of points assisted a specific percentage of people with a particular disease.

References

1. http://www.acupuncturetoday.com/archives2003/jan/01nccaomsurvey.html
2. Barnes PM, Powell-Griner E, McFann K, Nahin RL. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults: United States, 2002. Adv Data. 2004 May 27;(343):1-19.
3. Astin JA, Marie A, Pelletier KR, Hansen E, Haskell WL. A review of the incorporation of complementary and alternative medicine by mainstream physicians. Arch Intern Med. 1998 Nov 23;158(21):2303-10.
4. For more on this, read former JAMA editor George Lundberg MD’s book, Severed Trust: Why American Medicine Hasn’t Been Fixed.
5. Acupuncture: Review and analysis of reports on controlled clinical trials.
6. Gould, MacPherson. Patient Perspectives on Outcomes After Treatment with Acupuncture. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2001 7(3):261-8.
7. Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Sherman KJ, Hart LG, Street JH, Hrbek A, Cramer E, Milliman B, Booker J, Mootz R, Barassi J, Kahn JR, Kaptchuk TJ, Eisenberg DM. Characteristics of licensed acupuncturists, chiropractors, massage therapists, and naturopathic physicians. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002 Sep-Oct;15(5):378-90.
8. David M. Eisenberg, Roger B. Davis, Susan L. Ettner, Scott Appel, Sonja Wilkey, Maria Van Rompay, and Ronald C. Kessler. Trends in Alternative Medicine Use in the United States, 1990-1997: Results of a Follow-up National Survey. JAMA, Nov 1998; 280: 1569 – 1575.